canonical setting

Smooth non-log-concave + Fisher accuracy

∇V\nabla V is β\beta-Lipschitz, K0=KL⁡(μ0∥π)<∞K_0=\operatorname{KL}(\mu_0\Vert\pi)<\infty; target FI⁡≤ε2\operatorname{FI}\le\varepsilon^2.

Upper and lower bounds

Comparison table

5 scoped results. Tildes suppress logarithmic factors.

Edit table
Best-known and comparison results for Smooth non-log-concave + Fisher accuracy
ResultAlgorithm or modelComplexityGuaranteeOracle / startAssumptions and notesReviewSources
best upperExact ULD / FORSO~(βd1/3K0/ε2)\widetilde O(\beta d^{1/3} K_0/\varepsilon^2)FI⁡≤ε2\operatorname{FI}\le\varepsilon^2V,∇VV,\nabla VKL⁡(μ0∥π)=K0\operatorname{KL}(\mu_0\Vert\pi)=K_0Exact-diffusion implementation assumptions from the paper.Checked against the cited preprint. The upper bound depends on the initial log Rényi divergence.Checkedpreprint
best lowerGeneral first-order Fisher lower boundε−2+o(1)\varepsilon^{-2+o(1)}FI⁡≤ε2\operatorname{FI}\le\varepsilon^2First-orderK0=1K_0=1Dimension grows mildly with accuracy.High-accuracy lower bound in the stated growing-dimension regime.Checkedpublished
upper/lowerAveraged LMCΘ(β2dK0/ε4)\Theta(\beta^2 d K_0/\varepsilon^4)FI⁡≤ε2\operatorname{FI}\le\varepsilon^2 on average∇V\nabla VKL⁡(μ0∥π)=K0\operatorname{KL}(\mu_0\Vert\pi)=K_0The upper bound is checked. The matching lower bound is an AI-authored note and has not been independently checked.Checkedmonograph
lowerOne-dimensional first-order Fisher lower boundΩ(ε−1log⁡(1/ε))\Omega\bigl(\varepsilon^{-1}\sqrt{\log(1/\varepsilon)}\bigr)FI⁡≤ε2\operatorname{FI}\le\varepsilon^2First-orderK0=1K_0=1d=1d=1; sufficiently small ε\varepsilon.Separated from the growing-dimension lower bound.Checkedpublished
lowerLarge-initial-gap query complexityΘ(βK0/ε2)\Theta(\beta K_0/\varepsilon^2)FI⁡≤ε2\operatorname{FI}\le\varepsilon^2 at ε2=βd\varepsilon^2=\beta dFirst-orderKL gap K0K_0Ω~(K02/3)≤d≤O~(K0)\widetilde\Omega(K_0^{2/3})\le d\le\widetilde O(K_0).Equivalent to Θ(K0/d)\Theta(K_0/d) at the stated Fisher scale.Checkedpublished

Scope

Without log-concavity, Fisher information is used as a local stationarity criterion. A small Fisher guarantee does not by itself imply global total variation accuracy without an additional functional inequality.